Analisa putusan komisi pengawas persaingan usaha nomor 08/KPPU-L/2016 dalam kasus pengelolaan logistik di bandara internasional sultan hasanuddin makassar

Wijaya, Evanto (2020) Analisa putusan komisi pengawas persaingan usaha nomor 08/KPPU-L/2016 dalam kasus pengelolaan logistik di bandara internasional sultan hasanuddin makassar. Bachelor (S1) thesis, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University.

Text HALAMAN DEPAN LENGKAP.pdf Download (1MB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research related to logistics management of Sultan Hasanuddin Makasar International Airport managed by PT Angkasa Pura was transferred to PT Angkasa Pura Logistik without going through a tender, by discussing the issue of how the legal facts regarding the logistics management case at Sultan Hasanuddin Makasar International Airport and how the legal considerations of the Competition Supervisory Commission In its decision No. 08 / KPPU-L / 2016, PT. Angkasa Pura Logistik has been proven to carry out monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. The method used to discuss the problem is normative juridical, it is concluded that the legal fact that occurs in the management of the Logistics Cargo Terminal at Hasanuddin Airport Makassar is held by PT Angkasa Pura, in its management based on a Management Agreement between PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero) and PT Angkasa Pura Logistik . There are several competing companies managing airport related to logistics cargo, with the cooperation being a closed competitor business entity in the sense of not being able to enter the same market. In such conditions, PT Angkasa Pura Logistik dominate the dominant position. Legal considerations from the Business Competition Supervisory Commission in its decision Number 08 / KPPU-L / 2016 states that PT. Angkasa Pura Logistik has been proven to have committed monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, violating the provisions of Article 17 of Law No. 5 of 1999, as an unlawful act that harms a competing business actor. Business competitors who feel disadvantaged can sue PT. Angkasa Pura Logistik on the basis of having committed an act that violates Article 1365 of the Civil Code, because all of its elements have been fulfilled. A competing business actor who feels disadvantaged submits a claim for compensation in the form of reimbursement of costs, losses and interest as referred to in Article 1365 in conjunction with Article 1243 of the Civil Code in the form of reimbursement of costs, losses and interest. Keywords: Legal analysis, legal considerations, Management, Airport Logistics.

Item Type:	Thesis (Bachelor (S1))
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Keywords: Legal analysis, legal considerations, Management, Airport Logistics.
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KD England and Wales
Divisions:	Faculty of Law
Depositing User:	Evanto Wijaya
Date Deposited:	20 Mar 2020 02:54
Last Modified:	20 Mar 2020 02:54
URI:	http://erepository.uwks.ac.id/id/eprint/6058

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads