KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN AKTA PENGAKUAN UTANG OLEH DIREKSI DALAM PROSES PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan No. 40/Pdt.sus/2022/PN Niaga Sby)

Larasati, Andien (2024) KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN AKTA PENGAKUAN UTANG OLEH DIREKSI DALAM PROSES PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan No. 40/Pdt.sus/2022/PN Niaga Sby). [Tugas Akhir/Skripsi] (Unpublished)

	Text ABSTRAK.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text BAB 1.pdf Download (207kB)
	Text BAB 2.pdf Download (278kB)
	Text BAB 3.pdf Download (219kB)
	Text BAB 4.pdf Download (76kB)
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (131kB)
	Text LAMPIRAN.pdf Download (6MB)
	Text Laporan Cek Plagiasi 1.pdf Download (26kB)
	Text Laporan Cek Plagiasi 2.pdf Download (18MB)
	Text Jurnal Skripsi Andien.pdf Download (330kB)

Abstract

This legal research is entitled " The Strength of the Proof of the Deed of Debt Acknowledgement by the Directors in the Process of Postponing Debt Payment Obligations (Case Study of Court Decision Number 40/Pdt.Sus/PKPU/PN.Niaga Sby)”. In this study, the author discusses the legal power of proving debt recognition deeds made by company directors who violate articles of association by analyzing a PKPU decision. The director as the debtor in this case together with the notary tries to manipulate the evidence of the letter, in this case it is a debt recognition deed which in the proof of which there is a formal defect and cannot be accounted for so that it will harm itself and the opposite party. The Director as the representative and face of the company is basically authorized to represent himself in the internal and external affairs of the company, but things that exceed the limits are actually violated in the PKPU peace process. The author's purpose in conducting this research is so that later readers can understand the legal power of proving authentic deeds that are forged in the process of Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU). PKPU as an alternative to debt reconstruction between Creditors and Debtors should be used as an opportunity to reconcile and be implemented fairplay, so that both parties can reconcile and the declaration of bankruptcy judgment will not occur. The existence and importance of the deed of recognition for debtors as evidence in court has a very important position for creditors in order to convince the judge in deciding the case. Sanctions on the validity of the Deed of Debt Recognition falsified by the Director and Notary Public will also be discussed by the author. The existence and importance of the deed of recognition for debtors as evidence in court will also be explained by the author. Based on the title of this study, the author will use the method of statutory approach and case approach in solving this legal problem. Keywords : Proof, Deed of Debt Recognition, Directors, Delaying Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU)

Item Type:	Tugas Akhir/Skripsi
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Law
Depositing User:	30 Andien Larasati UWKS
Date Deposited:	04 Jul 2024 02:36
Last Modified:	04 Jul 2024 02:36
URI:	http://erepository.uwks.ac.id/id/eprint/17961

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads