Karakter penyelesaian sengketa dalam putusan arbitrase terhadap penundaan kewajiaban pembayaran utang

Prasetyo, Moch. Firman Adi (2023) Karakter penyelesaian sengketa dalam putusan arbitrase terhadap penundaan kewajiaban pembayaran utang. Masters (S2) thesis, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University.

	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (156kB)
	Text BAB 4.pdf Download (53kB)
	Text BAB 3.pdf Download (272kB)
	Text BAB 2.pdf Download (371kB)
	Text ABSTRAK.pdf Download (485kB)
	Text BAB 1.pdf Download (607kB)
	Text LAPORAN CEK PLAGIASI 2.pdf Download (13MB)
	Text ARTIKEL.pdf Download (477kB)

Abstract

Penelitian mengenai Karakter Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Putusan Arbitrase Terhadap Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, dengan membahas masalah Bagaimana karakter keberlakuan hukum terhadap putusan arbitrase dan Bagaimanakah bentuk upaya penyelesaian sengketa terhadap penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang. Penelitian dengan pendekatan hukum normatif diperoleh suatu kesimpulan bahwa: Karakter keberlakuan hukum terhadap putusan arbitrase, bahwa pilihan penyelesaian sengketa arbitrase didasarkan kesepakatan kedua belah pihak, dan putusan arbitrase bersifat final. Apabila terdapat pihak tidak melaksanakan putusan arbitrase secara sukarela, putusan arbitrase dilaksanakan berdasarkan perintah Ketua Pengadilan atas permohonan salah satu pihak yang bersengketa. Dengan perintah pengadilan (penetapan), digunakan mengeksekusi untuk memenuhi kewajiban pihak yang kalah. Bentuk upaya penyelesaian sengketa terhadap penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang jika para pihak tidak berhasil mencapai kesepakatan perdamaian, putusan PKPU, tidak dapat diajukan upaya hukum, sebagaimana Pasal 235 UUK&PKPU. Jika permohonan PKPU ditolak kreditur dapat mengajukan permohonan PKPU kembali, karena dalam PKPU tidak mengenal adanya asas nebis in idem. Research on the Character of Dispute Resolution in Arbitration Decisions Regarding Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, by discussing the problem of the character of legal enforcement of arbitration decisions and what forms of efforts to resolve disputes regarding postponement of debt payment obligations. Research using a normative legal approach concluded that: The character of legal enforcement of arbitration decisions, that the choice of arbitration dispute resolution is based on agreement between both parties, and arbitration decisions are final. If a party does not implement the arbitration award voluntarily, the arbitration award is implemented based on the order of the Chief Justice at the request of one of the parties to the dispute. With a court order (determination), it is used to execute to fulfill the obligations of the losing party. The form of dispute resolution effort regarding the postponement of debt payment obligations if the parties are unable to reach a peace agreement, the PKPU decision, cannot be submitted to legal action, as in Article 235 UUK&PKPU. If the PKPU application is rejected, the creditor can submit the PKPU application again, because PKPU does not recognize the principle of nebis in idem.

Item Type:	Thesis (Masters (S2))
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Penyelesaian Sengketa; Arbitrase; Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang; Dispute Resolution; Arbitration; Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Law > Master in Law Sciences Study Program
Depositing User:	Moch. Firman Adi Prasetyo
Date Deposited:	06 Feb 2024 03:28
Last Modified:	06 Feb 2024 03:28
URI:	http://erepository.uwks.ac.id/id/eprint/17255

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads